Disclaimer: The contents in this web site are only for your information and are not intended to be legal advice. While many of our applicants successfully obtain their I-140 approvals, the information here should not be considered as a guarantee of your green card application outcome.
"Independent reviewers have high regard for Dr. Lastname's publications"
Published Sep 18,2018
By Emmanuel Mapesa
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am advised that as part of my self-petition under EB1A, I should demonstrate that “Independent reviewers have a high regard for my publications”
My question: which of the 10 criteria for EB1A is satisfied by this demonstration?
Thanks. so much for your advice.
Posted in EB1A
Subscribe
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tigran Kalaydzhyan
5 years ago
If I understood your question correctly, this piece of evidence may help (but is not sufficient) to establish one of the following criteria:
[*] Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien’s work in the field for which classification is sought.
[*] Evidence of the alien’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;
Additionally, this may be considered as comparable evidence to establish the beneficiary’s eligibility (not among those 10 criteria) or in support of the either/both criteria from the second step of the two-part evaluation procedure:
[*] Petitioner is one of the small percentage of people who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.
[*] Sustained national or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise.
Disclaimer: The contents in this web site are only for your information and are not intended to be legal advice. While many of our applicants successfully obtain their I-140 approvals, the information here should not be considered as a guarantee of your green card application outcome.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
If I understood your question correctly, this piece of evidence may help (but is not sufficient) to establish one of the following criteria:
[*] Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien’s work in the field for which classification is sought.
[*] Evidence of the alien’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;
Additionally, this may be considered as comparable evidence to establish the beneficiary’s eligibility (not among those 10 criteria) or in support of the either/both criteria from the second step of the two-part evaluation procedure:
[*] Petitioner is one of the small percentage of people who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.
[*] Sustained national or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise.
Thanks for your laser-sharp reply. Appreciated.